Home | Links | Contact Us | Bookmark
Legal Forum Search :
   Homepage      News     Legal Directories      Legal Forum      Dictionary  
Legal News 

 What do you think about your state passing a law making you wear a seat belt?
I live in a state that passed the seat belt law,if an officer sees you or a passenger without a seatbelt on in your vehicle the driver gets a ticket.
How can it be enforced to make people be ...


 Can a pro-choice person please answer this?
how can abortion be legal yet when someone kills someone who is pregnant it is considerd a double homicide. That means that the fetus is alive and when you abort someone then that is murder. Any ...


 Am I entitled to a refund?
I bought a buggy from mamas and papas in may and 3 days later I returned it coz the front swivel wheel kept sticking. we got a replacement but that one had the same fault plus some other faults. We ...


 Who on earth thinks war actually solves problems..?
don't we see that we are bringing about our own destruction,its seems like world war 3 is just round the corner if we don't stop soon..God ...


 My five year old fell at our local Wal-Mart?
My five year old fell in the bathroom at our local Wal-Mart because of the terrible conditions. His grandfather had taken him to the bathroom, the floor was wet, and he fell and hit his head on the ...


 If you saw someone drop £50.00 would you hand it back or keep it ?
...


 How do you feel about the death penality?
In light of the recent execution, how do you feel about the death penalty?

Do you agree with hanging as opposed to the electric chair?

If this country had a fair penal system I ...


 If our brother dies who would be legally entitled to the house if he leaves no will?
My Mum and Dad have left their house to our younger brother. Sadly Dad has passed away now if our Mum dies the house goes to our younger brother who still lives with her. He has not made a will, so ...


 Do you think OJ Simpson was guilty?
I watched an interview of Chris Darden today that blew me away. He said: Johnny Cochran told him he new OJ was guilty but didn't care. Mr.Darden also went on to talk about all the hate mail he ...


 Child abusers, life in prison or castration?
there was a case a few weeks ago about a serial peadophile in the uk who got 7 years (victims as young as 3 years old) and could make parole in 5! i think this is sick, do you think life should mean ...


US trio lead on AIG's $85bn Government bailout
Details are slowly leaking out about how close AIG came to following Lehman Brothers into bankruptcy, only to have the Federal Reserve Bank of New York bail it out with an $85bn (£47.5bn) loan, reports The Am Law Daily.

Davis Polk & Wardwell represented the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve on the deal, according to the firm. The team was led by partners Bradley Smith and Marshall Huebner.

Two sources with direct knowledge of the deal say Sullivan & Cromwell represented AIG, while Simpson Thacher & Bartlett represented AIG's board of directors.

Sources say Rodgin Cohen led the Sullivan team, capping off a busy two-week period in which he advised both Fannie Mae and AIG on their government bailouts.

Kevin LaCroix of Oakbridge Insurance Services, the author of D & O Diary, a blog focused on management liability issues, has analysed several aspects of the government bailout, including the interest rate AIG will have to pay, which stands at a whopping 11.31%. If AIG draws the full $85bn the Federal Reserve has offered, it will be liable for $9.61bn (£5.37bn) in interest.

LaCroix also looks at the question of whether the sale of AIG's non-core assets could even cover the $85bn loan, while the Wall Street Journal quotes an analyst who estimates AIG's non-insurance assets could raise about $42bn (£23.5bn).

Another key question is what the US Government intends to do with its 80% interest in AIG, and whether it will be involved in the insurer's future business decisions. As LaCroix puts it: "Left unanswered in the Federal Reserve press release is the question of what this development means for AIG's continuing business operations. The primary goal of the Fed facility is the orderly sale of AIG's businesses. What does this imply about the future of AIG's operating companies? And what will be left of AIG after the 'orderly sale'?"

More US news, comment and analysis

The Am Law Daily is the website of The American Lawyer, Legal Week's US sister title.


Share and Enjoy!

Archive: Forum - Forum - Links - Links1 - Links2 - RSS - All RSS Feeds
Trusted legal information for you. 0.024
Copyright (c) 2007-2010 Find Legal Advice Sunday, February 5, 2012 - All rights reserved - Terms of use - Privacy Policy