
aulona37
|
OUR GREAT JUDICIAL SYSTEM!!!!!!!! I believe in justice for all but Johnny really helped him out. He was guilty then just as he is now.....If he personally did not do the deed, he had someone do it....I bet he watched it beeing done.....sorry....just upsets me!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Johnny
 |
Ya it was money.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

kmoe2g
 |
Well...the O.J. thing has nothing to do with whether or not the U.S. court systems works. Essential, it does work but there are some unfortunate circumstances when it fails.
O.J. was acquited because the prosecuting attorneys failed to meet their burden of proof, not because the court system doesnt work. As prosecutors, they must prove that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. There were certain issues in the O.J. case that obviously caused enough doubt in the minds of the jurors for them to find him not guilty. It happens.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

sheeny
 |
Justice is blind. And the jurors at his trial were stupid and incompetent.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Gabe
|
Lots of money and it made his lawyers even more famous.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

TakingStock
 |
Should have locked him up and thrown away the key. Wait, he's still searching for Nicole and Ron's killer on a golf course in Florida!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Pineapple
 |
It only works for poor and nonfamous people
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

rukidding
|
Race
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Speedfreak
 |
It is known as jury nullification.
For the prosecution to permit that jury to serve with those jurors was absurd.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

buckoe59ca
|
I think most people who followed the OJ case strongly feel that he is guilty. Under our system the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The problem in the OJ case was that an inept judge lost control of the court proceedings, and a totally incompetent prosecution team completely botched the case against him. Contaminated and therefore inadmissible evidence, police officers lying under oath, gloves that didn't fit etc etc. Fact is he is likely guilty but the hopeless performance by prosecution was not sufficient to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

pcheesewhiz
|
Because he was not convicted in the criminal trial. He was found guilty in a civil trial, but in a civil trial, prison terms cannot be given.. Of course we have a court system. In my opinion he was guilty, but obviously he was not found guilty by a jury of his peers. Just because we have a court system doesn't mean the selected jury will decide an issue in accordance with our beliefs. And ain't it shame, the bozo belongs behind bars.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

impossible
|
Drink Apple Juice because OJ will kill you.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Andizzle
|
A jury of his peers found him innocent. Plus he had a damn fine good lawyer.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Answerman
 |
MONEY, the rich can afford the kind of defense he got. The poor would be in jail or dead even if they were not guilty of the crime. Just ask anybody we have the best justice system in the world. Huh.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

redunicorn
 |
He got off because he had an expensive team of lawyers. Too bad. He should have gotten life in prision.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

akablackbetty
|
money money money.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Mashiara
 |
Black. He should have had his throat slit , or hung form a tree till he body fell off from his head.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

nothing
 |
A jury of his peers decided that he was not guilty.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

?
 |
?
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

psychoticlawnjockey
|
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$…
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

TruthIsRelative
|
Because Wookies live on Endor.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

sparkloom
 |
OJ is a psychopathic mutation who used the "race" card and money to defend himself against the system.
It worked even though he's more white than i am.
Juice escaped through a series of follies created at the hand of the LAPD and the mockery of the circumstantial evidence.
His life, however, will never exactly be FREE even though he's not behind bars. He's constantly badgered and will forever be known as having a major blemish and there is no search for the REAL killer. It's him and we all know it.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

locojoey
 |
Famous and black.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

b_haber
|
"If it doesn't fit, you must acquit." - Johnny Cochrane
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

The Mick "7"
|
The media made a circus out of it. The prosecution helped to pick a jury with a collective IQ of 12. Those morons never listened to a word. OJ was going to walk no matter what. Whether he did it or not will never be certain. The only thing that is certain is that two people are dead and both families lives will never be the same. And don't kid yourself, everyone and I mean everyone connected with that trial made a fortune. Even many of the jury members from the civil trial. One even produced a Broadway play about the trial. Pretty sad.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

animalmother
|
That racist cop spoiled it.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

volleyballchick (cowards block)
 |
Wasn't that decades ago??
But if you must know why, it is because fame and money buy you the best justice. Our justice system is for sale, and the rich can do whatever they please. If you don't agree, must I remind you of Michael Jackson and Robert Blake??
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

confused_rocker88
|
I guess you were wrong! He had a jury set on his side and he and the press claimed and yelled racism like they do for everything these days. And here is advice... our government is wack in some cases, and drink apple juice because OJ can kill you!!!! lol
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

dvz
|
IT IS CALLED MONEY AND RACE..
LOOK AT THE JURY.
LOOK AT WHAT HIS ATTY GOT PAID... 2 TO 3 MILLION.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

McGrath
 |
Because we have laws in this country that state that crimes must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Did OJ know or commit these crimes? I can't imagine that he is totally innocent but as described there were elements of his case that simply didn't make sense to me then or now. I can proudly say without reservation that I don't know what happened that night. I saw LAPD and the Chicago PD take apart every storm drain and garbage can along the path OJ took that night. They covered every square inch for a knife that simply disappeared from the face of the earth. If I had lived near LA you can bet I would have been out there looking too so I could have cashed in on the talk show circuit and written my book on How I Helped Bring OJ to Justice. But no one ever did and apparently never will. So logically the simple explanation is that the story as presented in court was factually inaccurate or incomplete. It seems clear that someone else at the very least took part in removal of the murder weapon. Did OJ act alone? There are certainly things that place him at the scene but for me there were too many convenient coincidences to eliminate all other possibilities. Too often we get caught up in a need for revenge which is not the same as justice. But what really interests me is why the hell people still get so worked up over something that happened 12 years ago. It makes me wonder why this is so symbolically significant to certain people.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|