
rustyjune84
 |
No not another Vietnam, Vietnam is so different. Vietnam killed way more. The goals of each are different. The way are country thinks about the military is different too. Only 15 military personel died in December, so I don't see us running for our lives. In Vietnam we were trying to stop the spread of communism. In Iraq I'm not sure what we are doing. Leaving Vietnam we failed to stop the spread of communism. Leaving Iraq, I don't know what we would be failing or if we would be failing at all. The only failure I see is that we did not find any weopons of mass destructon.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

John B
 |
Oh look. I believe Erudite is trying to entertain himself by attempting to draw people into emotional reactions to his inane and useless questions.
DON'T FEED THE TROLL!!!!!!!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Newt
 |
yes I agree full heartedly Dam% media!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Dark Spirit
 |
If the USA pulls out of Iraq, it will have shame such as in Vietnam, and politic enemy such as Cuba
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

jeeper_peeper321
 |
Just who is Iraq going to fall too ?
The Sunni's ?
The Shias ?
The Kurds ?
Your question makes no sense.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

jess m
 |
no
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Jake W
 |
The NVA took over South Vietnam after the US withdrew. Ho Chi Minh said himself that had the United States stayed they would have won. In this situation, there is no "North Iraq" and no "North Iraq Army". The United States is attempting to stabilize the country before they withdral, in order to prevent another Vietnam. Whether or not you believe they're putting in "Pro American Government" doesn't change the fact that there is now an Iraq government, and hopefully when we leave a fully functional Iraqi army.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

brian_0_0_5
|
No, learn your history before you post inflametory questions. A better question would be will we see another Cuba.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Golden
|
no. totally different. vietnam saw a popular movement of the entire country. there were two sides, american and vietnamese. when us troops finally pulled out vietnam united again. the division was implemented by french and american interests only, the government of "South Vietnam" puppets only.
in iraq there are several factions. there are several interested nations. at the very least there is sunni, shi'a, and kurds. many iraqi refugees live next door in syria, therefore syria has a serious interest. of course iran has a strong interest. saudi arabia shares a long border, marked in the past by squabbles over drilling rights.
so this is a very different situation.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Danny Lightning
|
well find out when it happens, some things only time will tell, cant prodict the future
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Love Canada
|
and then Vietnam prospered ...
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

tiTo 1987
|
Well, It's Afghanistan now, not Iraq.
I doubt there will ever be a war as big as or even close to being as big as Vietnam...
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Stars Sci-Tech
 |
No, Iraq has no adjacent lands she can claim at. If she does and succeed The U.N will act, but Iraq is weak at present.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

armouror2000
 |
If the usa wants to win in Iraq or Afghanistan try asking those countries their allies what to do rather than just getting moral support to take all the Glory
the SAS British NZ or Australians are more efficient than any other Military force
In fact the last time Bin Laden was in the Allies sights was the British SAS who were Minutes from surrounding him were ORDERED BY THE ALMIGHTY USA to break off the Attack because the USMC was TAKING OVER ?????????????????????
Why because the US military like war it keeps the Generals in a job a and they keep their enormous funding and they did not want Bin laden caught
Britain is going who will follow next i hope the alliance of the Willing collapses before the USA does more damage
I really hope the New President actually realises what the US military is doing and not only seeks advice from his own people but listens to what the other Worlds military leaders have to say have to say
For example Australia IS winning hearts and Minds and we have a more stable Region without the USA take a look Judge for yourself
the Americans Have never won any war where they were in charge without extending it Paton and Churchill told FDR the troops will be home Dec 1943 But the Idiot Eisenhower was in charge instead of
Earl Mountbatten who was senior more Experienced and the only one Qualified for the task
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

David
 |
You know, sometimes you do amaze me when you ask a good and decent question. Only time will tell, but I seriously doubt it will happen.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|