Home | Links | Contact Us | Bookmark
Legal Forum Search :
   Homepage      News     Legal Directories      Legal Forum      Dictionary  
Legal Forum    Military
Legal Discussion Forum

 Should we believe to president Bush's statement that Iran is source of deadly weapons ??
Though he has been proved wrong in the case of Iraq..And do you justify a powerful country like America going into war with weaker country like Iran and devastate it, with the support of its Allies.....


 Which is more badass the Army National Guard or Army Reserve?
i know im splitting hairs because both are basically the same but i want to know which is better in terms of "coolness". i already know that the guard does state and federal missions and ...


 Women in the military...What do you think?
As women are becoming more prominent in military service...where do we draw the line, or do we?
Additional Details
Why do people hate seeing women in the service?...


 If homophobia is immoral and most soldiers are homophobes, does that mean that our army is immoral?
???...


 My Boyfriend is going to IRAQ on April 1st for 2years!?
My boyfriend just got the news last week that he is going to be shipped out to IRAQ. He is ready to go, but Im not ready for him to go. I know that he is going to protect our Country, so that 911 ...


 What was the First World War called before the Second World War?
...


 Why ,you,American you believe yourselves higher has everyone?
Why you make **** all countries of the world, Iraq, israel, Lebanon…...


 What is something that I should consider when thinking about going into the military?
I will be 27 when and if I chose to go into the Navy. I am also a female. I have friends that both love and hate the Navy. I want to make sure that I don't a mistake either by going or not going....


 Gun for home protection?
I'm thinking of buying a gun? I'm not interested in your opinions other than which one to buy. What's the most sensible and reliable option. I was fully satisfied with my old M9 ...


 Will I hurt an Iraqi Vet's feelings if I tell him/her that they are not fighting for my freedom in Iraq?
Iraq has nothing to do with my freedom here in the United States "OR" lack of freedom in the United States. Want to know the truth? Iraq did not do 9-11 and there are no WMD in Iraq. The I...


 Did you know that the 9/11 Attacked Were Carried out by the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT?
This is not a conspiracy Theory. This is a conspiracy FACT.

I Placed the facts, and evidences into my myspace profile at:

http://www.myspace.com/c Click on the TOP ...


 How can they sleep at night?
Oh,Bush and Blair,
Are these your pranks,
To murder kids,with your planes and tanks,
Then, like hypocrites you give God thanks,
Desist for shame,
Proceed no further,
G...


 What would you do in this situation??
You are at war and during your mission you come accross an injured child who is a child of the enemy and he/she is running toward you yelling what you think is "help" but you cant quite ...


 Does anyone know of any examples of more than 2 family members enlisted in the military at the same time?

Additional Details
And especially if you know of parents/kids serving at the same time....


 Does Israel have the right to defend themselves from Lebanon?
...


 When Iran build a nucler bomb what should the United States do?
...


 Who's harder the U.S military or the U.K Military?
I'm going for my own state, and for queen and country. I just think we're better trained, with better equipment and from years of IRA violence better at Urban warfare. Plus we have the SAS.....


 If world war 2 was over in 1945. Why was my Dad over in Germany ?
My Dad was in the USA army. In Germany 1954-56...


 Why cant America just support are troops?
Doesnt anyone kno how demoralizing it is to our troops who do believe that this war is right...that most of the US dont care but killing the bastords who did 9/11....huh im so fed up with anyone who ...


 How did u decide on what branch of the military u wanted to join.Only vets?
First off let me tell u guys and girls thank u for protecting our country. How did u decide to join the army,marines,navy,rangers,...



Joe King
If Hitler had the atom bomb what would have been the target?
Also what was the target for the 2nd A bomb on Japan. Not Nagasaki as the first target was cloudy.



Show all answers
Post your answer

Andy
Rating
His wife (if he had one)

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



todp03
Hiroshima was the other target, Hitler would have probably have bombed Israel

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



ANF
Rating
London

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Vulture38
London, as he already had the rockets to deliver it.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



agreeable
Rating
Ah! But Hitler is not here, or is he? Perhaps we should ask current self-made 'Hitlers' answers you seek to your question.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



CLIVE H
Rating
The Nazis were working to creat a nuclear bomb, of that there is no doubt.

Had they been able to produce one, they would probably have been able to hit New York with a boosted version of their V2 rocket.

No, it's not a joke, it's all true. The Nazis failed to win the race to create a nuke weapon because the stupid bastards had kicked their best nuke scientists out of Germany. Most found their way to the USA - including their leader Mr Oppenheimer.

Phew - thank God for that.

Had the Nazis not surrendered when they did, it is highly probably [no proof] that the USA may have used a nuke weapon on a city in Germany, Hamburg and Berlin were already rubble - how about Munich? or Vienna in Austria?

Why the hell not?

Manhattan Project historical timeline
By 1941, the Germans were leading the race for the atomic bomb. They had a
heavy-water plant, high-grade uranium compounds, a nearly complete cyclotron, ...
http://www.atomicmuseum.com/Tour/manhattanproject.cfm

In effect, WW2 was a continuation of WW-One. It was phase two of the Anglo-Americans gettting on top of and finally resolving the argument between the Anglo Saxons and the Germans.

Score so far ; Germans 0 Anglo Saxons 2

There Germans had such a low opinion of us, especially the British, they did not believe we would do anything much.

Oh yeah!
Here is a Rolls Royce Supermarine Spitfire about six feet off the ground - doing it : -

YouTube - WWII British Supermarine Spitfire - VERY Low Pass
WWII British Supermarine Spitfire - VERY Low Pass.mpg.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ik0iBjHUCXM

Enjoy.....we won the Battle of Britain with planes like the one above.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Mullah Obama
By the end of the war the Nazi had been working on a submarine launched V-2 type rocket they wanted to use on NYC and other coastal targets in the USA. It could have carried a nuke warhead.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Chetak.
London or Moscow.

The primary target of Kokura was abandoned because of smoke cover.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



WTF
Russia

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



frankturk50
Rating
The UK and Russia he wouldn't have the capability to attack the US at that time.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



robert c
London!!

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Tom
Rating
London, closest to bomb = less cost, biggest threat!

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



panther
Russia or London they where his pain but think if had one he would of had 50 and the sad man he was would of blue up the world

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



talus057
Hitler would have never used it on London. Even though London was bombed, he said that he regretted going to war with the UK, and had always respected them. He only went to war with them because they sided against him and he had no choice. I think he would have probably used it on Moscow.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Chuck J
Rating
It's hard to say with any certainty what Hitler may have done I would go with London as a target. Mainly since it is close enough to be a valid target. Had Hitler been able to conquer the UK the war would have been vastly different. Had Hitler left his professional commanders alone to prosecute the war the results would almost certainly be different. The German Generals and admirals were very good and would have reached a better end than Hitler did.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Munchie 17
i'm thinking he would have made several and bombed london, moscow, st petersberg, new york, washington.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



mickstocks2
Rating
I reckon New York if he could do it. The Germans developed a plane that was capable of flying to New York with a bomb load but it was a one way trip and a limited load. If he could show the US that it was at risk then they may have backed off in the war. Another possible delivery system could have been by submarine.

Kokura was the primary target for the second A bomb attack.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



simon ST150
Rating
A good bet would have be America, without the Americans in the war the Japanese would have taken control of the Pacific whilst in Europe, Britain would loose it's vital ally so would have to try and gain a peace treaty with Germany. Whilst Germany didn't have a long rang bomber throughout WWII they were developing one which may have been ready for 1946 which would have reached the East coast of the U.S. They were also developing a larger version of the A4/V2 rocket.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



rotorhead
Rating
It would have been interesting what Hitler would have done with an A-bomb. If his would have been as large as ours, he did not have an aircraft big enough to carry it and I am not sure the V-2 had a payload capacity capable of lifting it. Plus, I don't know if he would have trusted it to a V-2. A little too unreliable for such a valuable weapon. Plus, if he did try to deliver it with a bomber, he ran the risk of Britian shooting it down before it made it to London.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Lenny
Russia

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Blaze it!!!
London more that likely.

Tokyo

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Gershon ben David
Rating
He would use it against the Russians. The second target would be the UK or USA.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Lurch
Moscow or London. Not sure about the second question.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Bilbo
Rating
Hitler had 4 revenge weapons he was developing:
the V1 pilotless aricraft bombs, V2 missiles which were rocket powered, the V3 so-called 'London Gun' a fixed bombardment gun aimed at Britain which was still being developed when the site was recaptured. For all these weapons the principal target was London.

However there was also a V4 on the drawing board - a long range intercontinental ballistic missile. The target for this was supposedly New York. The possibility of attacking a remote target which the Nazi's did not wish to occupy with a nuclear weapon would make strategic sense - although the consequense of fallout was probably not generally realised until after the attacks on Japan.

As the State of Israel was not founded until 1948 - this seems an ulikely target and the centre of world Zionism at that time would probablly have been reckoned to be the US.

The primary target for the second bomb (Fat Man) dropped on Japan was Kokura.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No






Archive: Forum - Forum - Links - Links1 - Links2 - RSS - All RSS Feeds
Trusted legal information for you. 0.034
Copyright (c) 2007-2010 Find Legal Advice Tuesday, June 18, 2013 - All rights reserved - Terms of use - Privacy Policy