Home | Links | Contact Us | Bookmark
Legal Forum Search :
   Homepage      News     Legal Directories      Legal Forum      Dictionary  
Legal Forum    Law & Ethics
Legal Discussion Forum

 How do I get out of jury duty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?
I'm supposed to "report" for jury duty tomorrow. I ignored it the 1st time and it says "previously absent" and it says "I may be fined" if I dont show up this time. ...


 Why can't our children read a bible at school but they can in prison?
...


 My 16 year old daughter?
got picked up by the police cuz they said she and a boyfriend are on tape trying to steal a car--she denies it said they were talking to a friend in between some cars and he happend to push a button ...


 Can my neighbour place her wheely bins on the road every day to stop other people parking outside her house?
My neighbour is a rather pathetic individual. She wheels her bins out of her front garden and places them on the street outside her house every single day before she goes to work so no one parks ...


 Can the Employer ask me to work in the weekend?
Hi,

Can the employer ask me to work in the weekend even though my current schedule is Mon-Fri 7-4PM.
Please note that the employer asked me last year but I refused to work on hte ...


 My boyfriend was just pulled over and he didn't have his license on him but it was at home . .what can happen
...


 Do you think that capital punishment is enough in itself, or should the criminal die a painful death?
On television recently, Micheal Portillo examnined the various ways of execution of prisoners sentenced to death. All except one caused some pain. So the question arose should the way in which the ...


 If smoking is bad, why are cigarettes sold?
a lot of you brag about how smoking is bad and harmful. ok then why don't u stupid store owners stop selling them at stores?...


 Smokers and non-smokers ...?
Should smoking be banned in areas that can affect others (workplace, restaurants, apartment/condos, etc)?

Should you have a right to smoke wherever?

Do you agree or disagree ...


 Why don't poor people see if they just cut out smoking and drinking and soft drinks, they can save $$?
They can save about $300 a month, so why don't they?
Some rich people smoke and drink, but most poor people smoke and drink, it is actually a vise of the poor. And yes, if they cut it ...


 I pumped 30 bucks worth of gas and left without paying?
What are my odds of being sentenced to a year in jail? I did something really dumb and now I have to go to court. I can't receive a one year sentence or more as I would face deportation because I...


 You are kicked to death by a group of young hoodies / chavs / drunk teenagers outside your home...?
They are 14 to 17 years old. About 6 of them. You did nothing other than ask the group to not damage your car or keep sound down. They launch and attack on you and repeatedly gang kick you.
...


 Can you drive a automatic car with a manual driving licence?
i know you cant drive a manual if you only have a automatic licence, is the same the other way round? in the ...


 Should gay couples be given the same legal rights as heterosexuals in adopting children?
...


 How can i recognise a suicide bomber?
...


 Is Canada morally wrong to allow a drinking age as low as 18?
...


 What are my rights when told I'm not being hired because I don't speak spanish?
I am highly qualified for this job.. They have other people working there that speak spanish that aren't as qualified as I am. It is not listed in the job requirements that you have to speak ...


 Shouldn't all these underaged girls be put in jail?
this trying to seduce all of us older guys is getting out of ...


 What gives G W Bush the right ?
to outlaw abortions because of his religous beliefs isnt that mixing church with state?
Additional Details
i know that he hasnt outlawed abortion and he cant do it himself but he has ...


 Do u agree with the death penality ???
I could never agree with it. Because the whole point of punishing someone is so that they would understand their mistakes and suffer the consequences of their action. But the death penality doesn'...



nikxnakx2
If Man Walked on the Moon, Why has No-one Done It Since?
Drfoot asked....Who believes that man actually walked on the moon or who thinks it was one big hoax.?

For those who believe man did walk on the moon.....why has there not been a progression of other countries following. Trying to have the fastest space shuttle, proving who has the best technology etc, etc.

Personally, i think it was an hoax. The lighting, shadows, windows, movement slowdown, non gravity waving flag etc etc leaves a lot to be desired.

What do you think???



Show all answers
Post your answer

SWEETIE
i personally feel it is hoax no one can have foot steps on moon because there is very less gravity there and it is very difficult to stand on moon u will be wobbling

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



has_shaf
Rating
It was a set up thats why
(just my opinion!)

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



catfordken
Rating
what a way for a government to cover up the loss of billions of dollars and takes minds of public regarding Vietnam,ken

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



michelob86
Rating
Some are born to ignorance. Some have ignorance thrust upon them.

I don't know which camp you're from, but sir, you are definitely ignorant.

Are you saying all of the astronauts are liars? Neil, Buzz, Mike and the rest....ALL of them? The ground crews and engineers? Everyone?

Your "logic" is that because no other country has gone since the 70s that it must not have happened in the first place?

Why would another country go there? It was mostly a rah-rah stunt from the US to show up the Russians. Which it did. If Russia went, second place is still second place. They certainly wouldn't want to emphasize that fact.

The other reason is there isn't a whole lot there new. It was good for science to find out what the moon is made of, but what's on the moon is what's on the Earth. It was split from the Earth early in the formation of the planet, so the rocks are the same chemicals found on the Earth.

Just like anything, Necessity is the Mother of Invention. NASA and other organizations are wanting to launch manned probes to other planets (Mars, Jupiter, etc). The easiest way is use the moon as a jumping off point. That will happen by the end of this century.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Johnny Guano
nobody ever walked on the moon! propaganda, pure propaganda

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



The Bricklayer
Rating
I could not care less either way.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



B
The fact that we had a disastrous space shuttle launch not to long ago, along with all the flops since the "landing on the moon" I find it hard to believe that they had enough technology back then to make it happen when we are lucky now just to get a shuttle into space.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



SKIBBY.
Rating
if it was a hoax surly they would of gone back by now with the technology they have now.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Ms Bleu
Too costly and it's no longer a big deal. The government only had a point to prove and were prepared to plundeer zillions of dollars by going to the moon after the russians beat them at putting the first man in space. There probably have been other moonwalks but nobody gives a $h*t!

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Michael
The point of doing it in the 60's was a technological race with Russia. Once it was done, the task became too expensive to continue. Public opinion to continue funding a project that no longer had a reason to exist. The US had already beaten the Russians to the moon. I'm sure if you had a powerful enough telescope (very Powerful), you could still see the remains of the landing craft, flag, and Lunar buggie that was left there, at several locations. It was done, and more than once.

That would be proof enough that the landings did indeed occur. Unless of course an alien race placed a US flag on the surface on the moon for us.

With all the private groups doing telescope research of the stars and moon, I think it would have been proven without a doubt if the landings had indeed been a hoax. All the rest is nay-saying.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Claypool
Rating
Because the moon has nothing to offer.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



raymac
To many downsides ,first, it's one hell of a long way away and it's very dangerous for the crew, second, money

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



joe_on_drums
They went, they saw, they analyzed, they returned.

Nothing there to return to, why would anyone go back?

No bathrooms on the moon.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



arwen4838
There's no point doing it again.
And why is this under Law and Ethics?

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



:-)
It costs a lot to do, untill we have the technology to build a base or something like that there then there is little point wasting massive amounts of money going there just for a look.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



leowin1948
Rating
It is doubtful as to whether Aldrin/Armstrong walked on Moon.The shadow and pictures are not genuine.Now the original tapes/recordings/video etc are missing.When USSR was ahead in space technology it might have been a CIA created drama to show that America is superior in technology.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



monkeyface
I think that even the USA would not be able to stage such an elaborate hoax & be able to keep it a secret for this amount of years.
I believe that Armstrong & Aldrin did walk on the moon & the reason no-one has since is because we have learned all we can from the moon & now need to send probes further afield.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



mike-from-spain
The reason is that it is so very expensive, the space race almost bankrupt Russia. It's only the very wealthy countries that can afford the billions required to develop the technology, build the rockets and modules, test them fully, dont forget the USA sent several missions to orbit the moon first, and then send one to land, and to what end, people have already been there, so you can't be the first, there's no life and moon rock has already been brought back

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Climate Changer
A Hoax, I doubt it. The Russians could easily exposed it, and discredit the the US Internaltional.

why I think we haven't gone back

Answer 1
humanrace wise - been there done that!

Answer 2
No Oil!, No Point! -
If there was a resource we needed on the moon, there would be national flags all over it by now.

Answer 3
like so many things
Once you're there its great, but its no worth the hassle of the trip.

Answer 4
Apollo was really riskly, the first moonlander, nearly failed to take off the surface of the moon. Apollo13 was touch and go for NASA, getting the crew back was both amazing and lucky.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Does it matter
i think they did walk on the moon but as there was jack s**t there decided it wasn't worth going back a bit like Wales

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



pops
Rating
They found out it wasn't made of cheese.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



taketwo
it all happened in Nevada deserts

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Frank M
Rating
Nobody was there to argue with of fight war with

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Avondrow
You can see a step by step rebuttal of the ridiculous 'Hoax' claims on several science sites - try Dr Phil's Bad Astronomy for a good one.
As to why we have not been back, I actually heard an explanation from the horses mouth, as it were, from a former Scientific adviser to the President of the USA. NASA scrapped further Apollo missions to concentrate resources on their next big project, the shuttle fleet. Having achieved what they perceived as the objective of Project Apollo, to get to the moon before the USSR, they saw little point in further exploration. It was costing 125 million dollars (in 70's money) to send each man to the moon. They decided that the best place, commercially and scientifically, to focus on was low Earth orbit. I sort of agree, but feel there was plenty of science left to do on the moon.
But we have learnt plenty from the experiments done on the surface and the samples returned. That's one thing the hoax people forget, the scientific data from the moon missions is in the public domain. You can do research with it. You couldn't fake that - you'd have to pay off every University, every research student in the field, in the entire world! (Including me!)

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



welshwife
Rating
because it costs too much money to get there plus there is nothing of any worth on the moon now that they have been there. its a dead planet and not worth bothering with

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



Paulien
conspiracy theory....there was a time when people were proving who had the best technology...does the cold war ring any bells? and as for us not going back, have you been watching the news lately? we cant afford to with all the wars we've gotten ourselves into...NASA's funding has gone down significantly...i just don't get why it's so hard for people to believe that we went to the moon!

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



openpsychy
1969. I still remember watching the television reports on moon landing. This is true and not a hoax. Let us give credit to the incredible technological achievement of NASA scientists and all others who were involved in this mission.No other country has been able to develop technological ability to repeat this event. Hence no one has done it since then.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No



brophy123
Rating
They have been on the moon since. They even drove a little dune buggy. There is no reason to go back to the moon so they are spending the money on projects that may help us out in the future.

Was this answer helpful to you?  Yes  /  No






Archive: Forum - Forum - Links - Links1 - Links2 - RSS - All RSS Feeds
Trusted legal information for you. 0.184
Copyright (c) 2007-2010 Find Legal Advice Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - All rights reserved - Terms of use - Privacy Policy