
curious_One
 |
that would be the best country God ever gave man -- USA, USA, USA!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

bob
|
The USa on man power and weapons alone
can't see it happening though as that would mean lots of lost revenue
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Button.Monster
 |
europe
they have the most countries
AND we have russia which is HUMUNGOUS
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

joethemetaldude
|
Hmmm tough. Australia would lose for sure. Europe isn't as far with there technologies as America. I think there would be a truce before too much fighting would go on. America would probably win.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

russiashock
 |
America. but seeing how that will never happen it is a mute point.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

nephilim
 |
Europe.....???.Europe...is NOT a country..it's a miss match of political TOSSERS...
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

bumpocooper
 |
Australia would have no shot. The only way they would survive is if they teamed up with either the USA or Europe. I would have to say the USA would win the war. I believe they are slightly stronger than a united Europe...but it would be close.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

chav69
|
the KING RUSSIA will beat the lot in 1
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

MARTIN A
|
why??? and who cares.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

polo
 |
Australia is a total looser. The whole continent will be devastated in a day or two by American. But America can't stand Europe since Europe has more countries, their weaponry combined altogether will match those of American.
Long live Europe!! Rest in Pieces Australia!!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

NIKAAY..
|
Well it would be between Europe and Aussi because Bush don't even know where Iraq is in comparison to Iran so don't ask him for Europe let alone Aussi!
I think Europe would win over Aussi because we are so blood thirsty over here, plus more people and weapons.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Countessa
 |
Remember some European countries are neutral i.e Ireland and Switzerland.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Sam
 |
What a daft question.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

kl55000
 |
I would say : "I would be the winner"
I would start by conquering Africa since it's not a very developped country military speaking, then cross the ocean to South America and start by attaking Brazil.
Once it is over go up and burn North America to ashes. Then from 2 sides I would attack Europe. One attack from Africa in the south and one from the north from America.
Once Europe is devastated, I would move east and take all the former Soviet countries and head toward Asia. My final move is when my annemi can't move anymore and is cornered in Oceania. That's weh nI strike for the last time and conquer Australia.
That's always my tactics when I play at RISK (^_^)
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

brioduinn
 |
Ireland would.
we are every where. sabotage
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

frank m
|
AUSTRALIA
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

dances with unicorns
|
In a three-way war... I'd guess it would be the U.S.; we've fought a war on two fronts before (WWII), and (I think) we have a larger military force. Europe as a whole doesn't have an army - only the armies of the individual countries; I have never gotten the impression that Australia has a big military force either. But... I'm no expert, so who knows? Mostly, I hope it never happens!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Peter
 |
There are no winners in a war. Just different levels of loss!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Paul M
 |
NO1............OBLIVION
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

White Man
 |
human being lose...only i know this!!!
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Andrew
|
europe - it took the soviet union , the united states, great britain and the commonwealth the defeat germany in WW2
if you add all of the EU countries to Germany then you can imagine the force -
australia ? they are not even worth considering - it would be bloody but europe would win - the us navy would lie at the bottom of the ocean - the cities would be ash - with over 20 000 soviet missiles to back europe up -
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

rosbif
|
Nobody.The Aussies would still be in the bar.Europe would be too busy arguing among themselves about who should be in charge and the Americans would shoot each other.They are very good at "freindly fire"
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

betty4charlesw25
 |
Europe has the French drag factor. America wouldn't get involved until nearly too later and Australia would still be on the beach. A draw.
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|

Rational_economist
|
Australia is as big as the US on a map, but there are only 20m Australians, compared with 300m Americans and 500m people in the European Union (a supranational and intergovernmental union of 27 democratic member states of Europe - the states who are best in Europe at co-operating with one another).
So, it's US v EU. The US spends more on defence (a.k.a. WAR) than all of Europe, Russia and China (!) put together, so they've got the better arsenal. But we have twice as many people....if you include Russia (half of which is geographically in Europe, even if politically they're very distant) then we've got tonnnns more potential soldiers. In a conventional war, it would be near-impossible to defeat an enemy that numbers more than half a billion. In a nuclear war, we're all fooked anyway (the US, UK, France and Russia all have nuclear weapons, so there would be devastation on both sides).
Was this answer helpful to you? Yes
/ No
|
|